
An Engraving of a Scene from Ann Radcliffe’s The Mysteries of Udolpho
Not too many years ago, I would have laughed to scorn the works of Mrs Ann Radcliffe and indeed the whole 18th century gothic novel. Since then, I have undergone a change of heart: I no longer eschew melodrama. Instead, I recognize that there are degrees of quality in the works ascribed to it and that it is a legitimate genre. To date, I have read four of Mrs Radcliffe’s five novels, having only The Sicilian Romance (1790) and a number of shorter works to read. I have just finished her first novel, The Castles of Athlin and Dunbayne (1789) and found myself loving it.
Originally, I thought of the 18th century gothic novel as a failed attempt to create a horror novel. But then, in the closing paragraphs of Athlin and Dunbayne, its author explains what she is trying to do:
Virtue may for a time be pursued by misfortune,—and justice be obscured by the transient triumphs of vice,—but the power whose peculiar attributes they are, clears away the clouds of error, and even in this world reveals his THRONE OF JUSTICE.
In other words, unless there are numerous dank abbeys and castles in her work, there is no hint of the supernatural. She comes close to it in her most famous work, The Mysteries of Udolpho (1794), but is too devout an Anglican to fall prey to such dubious flimflammery. (That didn’t stop Horace Walpole in The Castle of Otranto (1764) from going whole hog, but then he was undoubtedly less devout, being a wicked Whig politician, and earl, and man about town.
The edition of The Castles of Athlin and Dunbayne which I read was published by Oxford University Press and contained a superb introduction by Alison Milbank on the subject of Mrs Radcliffe and the gothic novel. That didn’t prevent OUP from butchering her last name (by making it Millbank). Sic transit gloria mundi.










You must be logged in to post a comment.